Re: amorpho titanium pollen !!!

From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" hetter at worldonline.nl> on 2001.06.22 at 16:04:58(6835) Well, even in Amorphophallus there are some species very close in morphology and even I wonder of they are rightly separated. Hybridising that stuff would cloud the issue even more. I think I better reduce them as soon as possible and then "hybridising" them is no fun anymore...... Wilbert +More ----- Original Message ----- To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L Sent: donderdag 21 juni 2001 22:11 Subject: Re: amorpho titanium pollen !!! > > > I'll go away and try to sort the mess in the simple group I chose to keep. > Then scans of the defined plants can be put up on the Web for Reference. > Most cultivar "names" are illegitimate, except those direct from tissue > culture. By the time they're in "Nurseries" & Florists, they have lots of > aliases & if they cross the pond by the time they get there, forged > passports. No wonder they won't let 'em out of Countries where they're in > hiding. It seems that every Spath cultivar that ever been born has had its > original name changed by its successions of owners. In comparison, the brave > new wave of Amorphophallod miscagenators are only just beginning their > cultural diversifying. It seems even at this stage that in practice you are > surprisingly unsure of species? > > R > > > >

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.