IAS Aroid Quasi Forum

About Aroid-L
 This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.

  ubba dubba reticulata
From: dburch23 at bellsouth.net (derek burch) on 2008.07.16 at 11:57:53(18168)
Dear Pete and Leland and everyone.

PLEASE don't just click 'Reply" without changing the subject line when the
topic of your email has changed.

I am interested in alocasias, I am interested in the alpha-taxonomist
drought, but I should like to be able to open the emails that refer to a
topic without having to take a lucky dip into what finally amounts to an
email morass. At the moment it is a bit like my filing system in my office
where everything goes into one file labeled "A" - that includes 'A letter',
'A reply' and so on. Very quick and easy. I do also have an "An" file where
I put 'An invoice'

, An unpaid account'.

But I digress .

Regards, to all,

Derek

+More
From: lbmkjm at yahoo.com (brian lee) on 2008.07.17 at 01:45:26(18181)
Dear Derek,

Aloha.

I am sorry...please understand that I am a high tech ignoramus and online neophyte. I am willing to learn. Also undertand that the system in my neighborhood is still on a rotary phone system. I will change subjects as our tangential subject switching demands...but, please jump in if we get carried away. I assumed I could not change the subject line in this forum...live and learn.

Aloha,

Leland

+More
From: mossytrail at hctc.com (mossytrail) on 2008.07.17 at 02:03:40(18183)
> Dear Pete and Leland and everyone.
>
> PLEASE don't just click 'Reply" without changing the
> subject line when the topic of your email has changed.
>
Tell you what: I'll start changing my subject lines, if
you'll Stop quoting the entire thread. Notice how I edited,
so that I only quoted the part I'm responding to.

Jason Hernandez

+More
From: botanist at malesiana.com (Peter Boyce) on 2008.07.17 at 05:25:55(18184)
Dear Derek & all other folks who have been driven to distraction by our hitting reply thoughtlessly...

SORRY.

I will repost the alpha-tax drought/molecular thoughts under a new thread

Peter

+More
From: botanist at malesiana.com (Peter Boyce) on 2008.07.17 at 06:19:40(18187)
Whoa Leland...you have a PHONE LINE.... LUXURY...we have two empty cocoa
tins joined by long a string.... before that we had a pigeon... but the cat
ate him....

+More
From: botanist at malesiana.com (Peter Boyce) on 2008.07.17 at 06:33:54(18188)
Dear Derek,

I answer 50 - 75 emails a day, many from students asking questions that cannot be answered in a line or two. I contribute to aroid-l freely and am very happy to continue to do so, but I will be honest and say that I tend to answer emails very quickly (hence the embarrassing number of typo-bloopers that my postings tend to contain) and frequently (as is all to obvious) don't change the thread. I will endeavour to be more punctillious in changing the thread.

Peter

+More
From: lbmkjm at yahoo.com (brian lee) on 2008.07.19 at 21:08:46(18197)
Dear Pete and all techies in virtual world,

Yes, I live in the lap of luxury and do have a landline on a rotary dial. However, it is faster to use my tried and true system of smoke signals. I usually keep a small fire bundle handy near the garage...but with the recent trade winds, my wife has been nervous about the dry tinder lying about the house. In the old days, we had sliced peach cans and strings, but the multiple threads for our long distance connections were hard to negotiate in the bedroom. Once we gathered up all of the string; we were first runner-up in the Guiness ball of string contest for the Pacific region. Our problem with the pigeon system was that they never returned home...your cat may be the explanation.

Aloha,

Leland

+More
From: dburch23 at bellsouth.net (derek burch) on 2008.07.20 at 00:55:51(18198)
Hey, Pete,

Don't mind me.

But as for the guy who thinks he is being clear by only quoting the parts to
which he is responding, I would say - oh, is that why I can never understand
your emails! Imagine trying to edit an email response to an article that did
this.

Old and unabashed,

Derek

+More
From: mossytrail at hctc.com (mossytrail) on 2008.07.22 at 01:00:30(18210)
> Hey, Pete,
>
> Don't mind me.
>
> But as for the guy who thinks he is being clear by only
> quoting the parts to which he is responding, I would say -
> oh, is that why I can never understand your emails!
> Imagine trying to edit an email response to an article
> that did this.

It is okay to quote a whole post if that helps you
understand (as you see I just did here); but I was objecting
to several people here quoting an ENTIRE THREAD. Before
getting to this post of yours, I just scrolled down through
what amounted to pages and pages of the previous post on
this topic.

And even for those who are not set to digest (which I am to
keep my mumber of daily emails manageable), there are those
with limited bandwidth who have a lot of trouble downloading
long emails -- so it is inconsiderate to send them an entire
thread which they have already read. Especially when the
thread is many paragraphs long, and the reply only a couple
of lines.

+More
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.