>
> The Newsletter is getting
> better and better, I think, while in Aroideana we remain a
> place of good quality taxonomic material and very little
> else.
> So, is your
> sharing of experience on either topic actively in your
> computer even as we correspond ? Bashful about writing? I
> can do it for you if you give me an article in rough form.
> Not interested in these topics? Well, what the hell are
> you interested in, and why I haven't I been told about it
> directly, with an offer for a contribution as part of the
> communication?
Well!
I don't know who's been complaining about what, but I
maintain my membership for professional reasons -- to stay
abreast of Aroid research in ANY line of enquiry, taxonomic
and otherwise. I always assumed the main purpose of
Aroideana was precisely to be an outlet for this kind of
specialized work; otherwise we would publish in BioTropica,
Actum Botanicum, or any number of more generalized journals.
To me, the newsletter is just icing on the cake -- it is
fun to read about collecting expeditions; but the point of
those expeditions is to find the new species described in
Aroideana.
And I must say, when I contributed my first article 5 years
ago, I was pleasantly surprised I did not have to pay a
per-page printing fee. I learned at university that most
journals charge the authors.
Nor am I sure I know what you mean when you say "taxonomic
material and very little else." In the most recent issue,
there were 17 articles, of which only 3 were taxonomy; 4
were about floristics, 3 were about horticulture, and the
remaining 7 about a variety of other topics.
It seems to me those with a serious interest in some
particular subject, are already doing work on it and writing
about it. So if there is something some reader wishes to
see covered, the best advice I could give would be to start
by writing about what you yourself have learned; someone
else reading that article may then be inspired to jump off
from there.
Jason Hernandez
Naturalist-at-Large
|
IAS on Facebook
IAS on Instagram
