Re: [Aroid-l] 'Indian Giant' ploidylevel [was:Re: Sauromatum x

From: "Derek Burch" <derek at horticulturist.com> on 2011.01.26 at 18:27:52(21824) Bernhard, If you think that this would be too brief for Aroideana (and we are getting very close (=way past) deadline for vol. 34, how about smoothing the edges of this for Carla to put into the Newsletter. You could incorporate your communications with Tony and round it out nicely as a preliminary report of work in progress. Regards, Derek HTML +More From: aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com] On Behalf Of StroWi@t-online.de Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:14 AM To: Discussion of aroids Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] 'Indian Giant' ploidylevel [was:Re: Sauromatum x Pinellia hybrid] Christopher, I did not think about publishing. I just wanted to send that result to the group, since the discussion of polyploidy of 'Indian Giant' came up the other year. If I find time to do some chromosome counts, it might be worth to write a few lines for Aroidiana. In the given state it's rather a short note.... Happy growing, Bernhard. -----Original Message----- > Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:18:29 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] 'Indian Giant' ploidylevel [was:Re: Sauromatum > x Pinellia hybrid] > From: Christopher Rogers > To: Discussion of aroids href="mailto:aroid-l@www.gizmoworks.com">aroid-l@www.gizmoworks.com > Nice! You going to publish this in Aroidiana?? Happy days, Christopher ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01CBBD5C.D65FE200-- --==============p32579555653637483=

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.