Re: [Aroid-l] New aroid in western Australia? Typhonium on

From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" <hetter at xs4all.nl> on 2011.02.06 at 08:10:39(21859) oooh, I am deeply ashamed. This is indeed true. I was writing in the spur of the moment I guess. Indeed, Peter and I did not recombine L. mirabile to T. mirabile but you youirself, the Inventor of Lazarum. Must feel good to have this name reinstated gain, I guess. Thus far it seems quite difficult indeed to separate Lazarum from Typhonium s.str. Distinguishing Sauromatum s.l. from Typhonium s.str. works [sort of] (see Flora of China and the Cusimano et al. paper). Cheers, Wilbert +More > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com > [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com] Namens Alistair Hay > Verzonden: donderdag 3 februari 2011 3:24 > Aan: Discussion of aroids > Onderwerp: Re: [Aroid-l] New aroid in western Australia? > Typhonium on thescaffold !! > > Thanks Wilbert :) but one tiny point of correction. It is > Typhonium mirabile (A. Hay) A. Hay... If you made the same > combination in 2000, yours is an isonym.... > > You are very polite about the Japanese paper. I am astonished > it was published in systematic botany at all. > > What will be intriguing will be to see how these molecular > clades are going to be dstinguished morphologically. > _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.