From: "Ron Iles" roniles at eircom.net> on 2003.02.14 at 01:07:47(9977)|
Forgive me if I reciprocate the respectful informality for once..
Hi Gracious Big Daddy-o!
Is not a Collection a set of labels with specimens attached? So, does
Nature REALLY still need labels? Won't it be good when you can put your
phalloid DNA in one end of a Computer & get a supremely impressive number
for it out at t'other? Or better maybe, when every aroider has a
super-probe too for DNA display. (Taxonomy can no longer be fooled by
Ronnio & Ol'-ron were rendered more Brain dead by the volleys of hailstones|
of genera resulting from your fiendish Nederland rain dancing on the
Clubette GigaSite. Wilb, by any standard, Star Performance taxonomic
No Valentine? Ne'er mind someone will surely send you a suitable aroid to
adorn your little shamrock if you wear one on St. Patricks Day?
Please note I changed the Onderwerp
Secretary, Wilby's Fan Club
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Typhoniums linked to God Numbers
> hah, and I am supposed to believe this lousy attempt at an excuse?????
> hee, you better try again, Ronnieboy!!
> Wilb (didn't get a valentine ......yet.......sob, sob)
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > [mailto:email@example.com]Namens Ron Iles
> > Verzonden: woensdag 12 februari 2003 18:58
> > Aan: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Onderwerp: Re: [aroid-l] Typhoniums linked to God Numbers
> > Sorry, Good 'ole Wilb, I was applauding your recent Floral
> > Art Work on line
> > & Oh! It should have read "I hate taxidermy" not "I hate taxonomy",
> > whatever that is
> > Happy Valentine's Day or whatever from R
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid"
> > To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:42 PM
> > Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Typhoniums linked to God Numbers
> > > > Wilbert & friends your work is brill. I hate taxonomy
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > >
> > > Am I being a fool or do others also not understand why good
> > ol' Ron writes
> > > such a mysterious quote to a taxonomist?
> > >
> > > Wilbert
> > >
> > >