IAS on Facebook
IAS on Instagram
IAS Aroid Quasi Forum
This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.
Re: Aroids growing better in water?
From: "Kathy Kempf" wont_read101 at hotmail.com> on 2002.06.06 at 15:50:33(8962)|
Steve, as a former AZ resident, and outdoor lover and explorer, I
encountered many cacti and other succulents that grew in standing water.
Among the types I have seen growing this way were: organ pipe cactus
(Stenocereus thurberi) in or around the National Monument, a grandma cactus
(probably a species of Garambullo), and an unidentified type of cholla. All
were grounded in the shore, but I could see many of the roots penetrating
into surrounding permanent water (lake, pond, etc) and the flood-plain in
which they grew made it obvious that the plant was periodically flooded,
which would last for at least a week. Haven't tried to grow any of cactus
this way, but they do grow that way naturally.
Kathy Kempf Ohio Zone 6
>From: Steve Marak
>To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
>Subject: Re: Aroids growing better in water?
>Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 16:25:47 -0500 (CDT)
>On Tue, 28 May 2002, ron wrote:
> > Re: Aroids growing better in water?Phalanopsis cannot sit in water and
> > live very long!!! I hope nobody took you literally.
> >> Even epiphytic orchids, apparently. I saw several yesterday at a
> >> friend's--including a Phalaenopsis!
> >>> I would venture to say that just about ANY plant can be grown in
> >>> water (hydroponically).
>There are some people over on the cactus & succulent list who swear
>they've seen cacti (terrestrial, desert type cacti, not the epiphytic
>ones) very happy growing hydroponically.
>I wouldn't know myself, but according to one, who seemed pretty
>knowledgable, the issue is oxygenation at the roots, or more accurately a
>plant's ability to tolerate lack of oxygen in the root zone, not whether
>the roots are submerged or not. He claimed that with sufficiently aerated
>water, pretty much anything was possible.
>Again, I haven't seen it myself, but there's a certain logical consistency
>to the idea and it fits with various other things in a pleasing way.
>-- Steve Marak
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.