Your search for articles by authors with the surname Haigh has found 3 articles.

Articles of 3 pages or less are available for free to IAS members for download, and longer articles for $5. Articles from issues in 2016 and beyond are only available electronically, and are free to current members when they are logged in.

Please remember that all Aroideana articles are protected by copyright, and you may NOT distribute even electronic copies without permission from the authors or editor.


Year
Vol.
(Issue)
Pages
Author(s)
Title
2008
31
148-154
A. Haigh, L. Lay, S. J. Mayo, L. Reynolds, M. Sellaro, Josef Bogner, Peter C. Boyce, Thomas B. Croat, Michael H. Grayum, R. Keating, Carla V. Kostelac, Alistair Hay, Wilbert L. A. Hetterscheid, M. Marcela Mora A new website for Araceae taxonomy on www.cate-araceae.org (Buy)
 ABSTRACT: The development and current progress of the Cate-Araceae website is described and its relation to the aroid community discussed in the context of rapidly developing initiatives to migrate traditional descriptive taxonomy onto the internet (ETaxonomy).
2015
38E(1)
84-87
A. Haigh Araceae and eMonocot: An online resource for monocot plants of the world (Read)
 ABSTRACT: eMonocot (http://e-monocot.org) is an online resource for monocot plants created by the eMonocot project, a consortium of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Oxford University and the Natural History Museum, London, as well as contributions from monocot taxonomists and communities worldwide. Method and progress are described, including the addition and gathering of information on Araceae.
2016
39(2)
101-120
Peter C. Boyce, A. Haigh Rhaphidophora bogneri (Araceae: Monsteroideae: Monstereae) a new species from West Africa, and notes on the Rhaphidophora africana Complex (Buy)
 ABSTRACT: Rhaphidophora bogneri P. C. Boyce & Haigh is described as a new species from Gabon, equatorial West Africa, defined by inflorescences pendent during anthesis and fruiting. Rhaphidophora is additionally reviewed for Africa and three described species are accepted, of which R. africana N. E. Br. is considered undoubtedly polyphyletic, likely encompassing upwards of four species of which at least three are considered to be taxonomic novelties. Unfortunately, available preserved collections coupled with political circumstances prevailing throughout much of the species’ geographical range currently make a proper taxonomic treatment impossible. Rhaphidophora ovoidea A. Chev., described from fragmentary material from basalts, is treated as inadequately known. Rhaphidophora bogneri is illustrated from cultivated living plants, all described species are also illustrated from their nomenclatural types. The three accepted African Rhaphidophora species are delineated with a key.