IAS Aroid Quasi Forum

About Aroid-L
 This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.

  Re: [Aroid-l] Wikipedia`s falsehoods
From: <ju-bo at msn.com> on 2009.02.04 at 11:01:17
Dear All=2C

Between what Steve Lucas has suggested=2C then the great information which Jason provides (below)=2C I THINK we have covered about as many bases we can concerning locating good information on aroids (and eliminating using Wikipedia). =3B
Jason does bring up a good point--- where do we find information on some of the more obscure genera on which there are limited or NO publications!?!  =3B Allow me to say that this forum (aroid-l) then provides an INVALUABLE service=2C as it has contact with MOST of the world experts on aroids or has a member who reads this forum=2C who can usually contact the person who has the knowledg. =3B Most times when a request has been submitted=2C there has been SOMEONE who reads the request and is able to eventually supply the information being sought!

The Best=2C and Good Growing.

Julius Boos
WPB=2C FLORIDA

>=3B From: mossytrail@hctc.com
>=3B To: aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
>=3B Date: Tue=2C 3 Feb 2009 15:14:12 -0800
>=3B Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Wikipedia`s falsehoods
>=3B
>=3B If you have access to a university computer system=2C they may
>=3B be subscribed to JSTOR=2C Biological Abstracts=2C or some
>=3B similar database. These will take you to peer-reviewed
>=3B articles. JSTOR is especially useful=2C because every article
>=3B it references is scanned in its entirety in the database --
>=3B you can read it righ on your monitor.
>=3B
>=3B Of course=2C this necessitates that something BE published on
>=3B the taxon in question. For some obscure taxa=2C there is
>=3B nothing out there. Another drawback to JSTOR is that is you
>=3B search the full-text of the articles=2C you may get articles
>=3B in which your search term appears only in the "works cited=2C"
>=3B as part of the title of another article you probably already
>=3B read.
>=3B
>=3B Jason Hernandez
>=3B Naturalist-at-Large
>=3B
>=3B >=3B Message: 1
>=3B >=3B Date: Sat=2C 31 Jan 2009 23:37:45 -0800 (PST)
>=3B >=3B From: "E.Vincent Morano" <=3Bironious2@yahoo.com>=3B
>=3B >=3B Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Wikipedia`s falsehoods
>=3B >=3B To: Discussion of aroids <=3Baroid-l@gizmoworks.com>=3B
>=3B >=3B Message-ID: <=3B547443.98273.qm@web63403.mail.re1.yahoo.com>=3B
>=3B >=3B Content-Type: text/plain=3B charset=3D"iso-8859-1"
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B any idea's on where to find an unbiased source?
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B --- On Sat=2C 1/31/09=2C ju-bo@msn.com <=3Bju-bo@msn.com>=3B wrote:
>=3B
>=3B _______________________________________________
>=3B Aroid-L mailing list
>=3B Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
>=3B http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
--_ce26164b-4ef8-4db0-a7ee-759e3855cb53_----===============4261370617506130804==
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.