From: Peter Boyce <phymatarum at googlemail.com>
on 2011.06.11 at 02:17:33
Hi Ferenc,
=A0
This is a Schismatoglottis. It maybe S. roseospatha, but it is hard to tell since the inflorescence you depict is in fact a teratological artefact. The spathe has reverted to a a modified leaf. My guess is that the plant has been raised from tissue culture and is still affected by the chemicals used to induce multiple-shoot production. I aslo suspect that the plant may have been treated with chemical to=A0compact its grwoth too.
=A0
=A0It will be interesting to see what type of inflorescences it produces once the hormonal effects wear off.
=A0
Out of interest, where did you buy the plant?
=A0
Best
=A0
Peter
On 11 June 2011 03:40, Ferenc Lengyel <feri.lengyel@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I have bought a plant as an Anubias, but I am pretty sure that it is not an Anubias. What can it be? Some pictures of the plant (it is a compact, small plant in a 5 cm /2 inches/ diameter=A0container):
=A0
adaxial leaf surface:
=A0
abaxial leaf surface:
=A0
whole plant:
=A0
inflorescence:
=A0
inflorescence from above:
=A0
Ferenc
_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
--0016e6465518fae60904a5664929--
--===============1658206364332470457==
|
IAS on Facebook
IAS on Instagram
