IAS Aroid Quasi Forum

About Aroid-L
 This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.

  Re: [Aroid-l] Colocasia antiquorum
From: Sherry Gates <thetropix at msn.com> on 2014.09.09 at 17:11:17
Hi everyone!  =3BHope you're all doing very well.  =3BI just want to make sure I have this right regarding the name of this Colocasia.  =3B  =3BDoes that mean that Colocasia =3BIllustris &=3B Black Beauty should be labeled Colocasia fontanesii var. Illustris  =3B &=3B  =3B C. fontanesii var. Black Beauty?  =3B I know it's a goofy question=2C I just want to make sure I'm understanding correctly. : ) =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B =3B
 =3B  =3BAre there any of the Colocasias that are =3Bantiquorum=2C or is antiquorum an obsolete/invalid name? =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B =3B
 =3B =3BIs C. Black Beauty is a sport or a hybrid of C. Illustris? =3B
 =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3BThanks and I hope y'all have a wonderful week!
 =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3BSherry =3B
 =3B  =3B =3B
 =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B  =3B

Sherry Gates=0ATheTropix@msn.com


Date: Tue=2C 9 Sep 2014 11:06:54 +0800
From: phymatarum@gmail.com
To: aroid-l@www.gizmoworks.com
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Colocasia antiquorum

George=2C

Yes=2C correct.

Sadly=2C no reference as yet - Bogner is working on this!

Peter

On 3 September 2014 15:29=2C George Yao <=3Bgeoyao@gmail.com>=3B wrote:
Peter=2C

Thanks for the info! So =3BColocasia esculenta var. antiquorum =3B(Schott) Hubb. &=3B Rehder and =3BColocasia =3Bantiquorum =3BSchott are now Colocasia fontanesii Schott=2C am I right? If so=2C where can I find the reference?

George Yao
Metro-Manila
Philippines=0A
=0A=0A=0A
On Sep 3=2C 2014=2C at 6:28 AM=2C Peter Boyce <=3Bphymatarum@gmail.com>=3B wrote:

Hi George=2C

I think Steve may have got the wrong end of the stick - the problem isn't so much that antiquorum is a unique species but that it cannot be used as the name for aunique species - he next available name for which is fontanesii. =3B
=0A

Peter


On 2 September 2014 13:30=2C George Yao <=3Bgeoyao@gmail.com>=3B wrote:
=0A
Hello Aroiders=2C

In his webpage on Colocasia esculenta in his "The =3BExotic Rainforest" website=2C the late Steve Lucas pointed out that "A new paper is now in the process of being published that will establish that =3BColocasia antiquorum =3Bis a unique species.=94 Has the mentioned paper been published yet?
=0A

George Yao
Metro-Manila
Philippines

_______________________________________________
=0AAroid-L mailing list
=0AAroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
=0Ahttp://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
=0A

=0A_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l


_______________________________________________
=0AAroid-L mailing list
=0AAroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
=0Ahttp://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
=0A

=0A
_______________________________________________=0AAroid-L mailing list=0AAroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com=0Ahttp://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
--_094d29cc-26cc-43a5-a29a-dbb365ee0cb8_-- --===============6132969191306301351==
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.