Phyllotaenium

From: Anna Haigh <aroidhaigh at gmail.com> on 2014.01.10 at 12:05:50(22964) I see in several places (incluing the Uberlist) Phyllotaenium lindenii is now considered an accepted name for what was in Caladium. However I cannot find any references for this. Can anyone let me know if there is a publication, or if not, who has resurrected it any reasoning behind this? Many thanks, Anna HTML +More --001a11c3f1541046ba04ef9c8c84-- --==============�40522351181242333==

From: Peter Boyce <phymatarum at gmail.com> on 2014.01.10 at 23:47:22(22968) Hi Anna, Check with Eduardo on this - it was added to the Ueberlist on his consultation. Peter HTML +More On 10 January 2014 20:05, Anna Haigh wrote: I see in several places (incluing the Uberlist) Phyllotaenium lindenii is now considered an accepted name for what was in Caladium. However I cannot find any references for this. Can anyone let me know if there is a publication, or if not, who has resurrected it any reasoning behind this? Many thanks, Anna _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l --001a1133b05ef0f5a204efa65835-- --==============�39562148857975092==

From: "Tom Croat" <Thomas.Croat at mobot.org> on 2014.01.13 at 16:22:46(22971) Dear All: I was not aware that this species was placed back in Phyllotaenium Andr� but it clearly does not fit well among the other typical Caladium species and was transferred to Caladium lindenii by Madison as late as 1981. He moved it into Caladium from Xanthosoma where it clearly did not fit either. This will bump the number of neotropical genera by one but will still not displace Asia as the most generically rich part of the World for Araceae. Tom HTML +More From: aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com] On Behalf Of Peter Boyce Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 5:47 PM To: Discussion of aroids Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Phyllotaenium Hi Anna, Check with Eduardo on this - it was added to the Ueberlist on his consultation. Peter On 10 January 2014 20:05, Anna Haigh wrote: I see in several places (incluing the Uberlist) Phyllotaenium lindenii is now considered an accepted name for what was in Caladium. However I cannot find any references for this. Can anyone let me know if there is a publication, or if not, who has resurrected it any reasoning behind this? Many thanks, Anna _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l ------_=_NextPart_001_01CF107B.B1AB7D69-- --==============d20343188797152161==

From: Peter Boyce <phymatarum at gmail.com> on 2014.01.24 at 00:20:36(22974) Anna, Tom. Eduardo is working on this. Peter HTML +More On 10 January 2014 20:05, Anna Haigh wrote: I see in several places (incluing the Uberlist) Phyllotaenium lindenii is now considered an accepted name for what was in Caladium. However I cannot find any references for this. Can anyone let me know if there is a publication, or if not, who has resurrected it any reasoning behind this? Many thanks, Anna _______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l --001a11c25deac06aca04f0ac5303-- --==============s29271395279795114==

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.