RE: [Aroid-l] Yet another set of additions

From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" hetter at xs4all.nl> on 2005.08.09 at 15:52:23(13291) Hi Linda, You mean as you see on the pages? Those are two different clones with the usual set of minimal differences. So that is not out-of-the-ordinary. Evolution brings us variation and that's a good thing or we taxonomists would be out of a job.......... Cheerio, Wilbert +More Van: aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@gizmoworks.com] Namens LMassey628@aol.comVerzonden: maandag 8 augustus 2005 22:29Aan: aroid-l@gizmoworks.comOnderwerp: Re: [Aroid-l] Yet another set of additions In a message dated 8/8/2005 3:24:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, hetter@xs4all.nl writes: Folks,Another set of additional pix for Amorphophallus, this time mainly petiolesand leaf-parts. Especially the pix of the developing leaf of Am.cicatricifer are awesome (if I may say so myself...........). Thanks also toBonaventure Magrys, who sent in a few pix of Am. mossambicensis andyunnanensis (this last one in a next batch). Additions:albispathuscicatricifer (developing leaf)consimilisgalbrahenryihottae (leaf bulbil!)julaihiikrausei (including clone HAM040, a deviating form)lanuginosuslongiconnectivusmossambicensis obscurussmithsonianus (watch the unique minutely toothed leaf-margin)symonianusCheerio,Wilbert Wilbert - Does Amorphophallus cicatricifer have two different flowers ? Are they two different collections of the same species ? Linda _______________________________________________ Aroid-l mailing list Aroid-l@gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l

Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.