Have you folks been following Steve Lucas's developing story about the|
Anthurium regale bloom? The point that interests me here the most is the
morphological and color changes that this inflorescence has displayed
over the LONG bloom process.
What happens if a scientifically-minded collector happens upon such a plant
in the early stages of bloom? Let's assume she secures a specimen and
describes it with perfect accuracy. Later, another collector makes a hike
into the same area, finds an exact clone of the first specimen in bloom, but
at a maturation date six weeks later than was available to the first
collector, when the inflorescence is a completely different color and when
all the little "naughty bits" have morphed.
How does the taxonomist know that the two plants are the same?
It seems to this untrained observer that only a painstaking record such as
that on Steve's site would be adequate to describe a species and avoid the
Here is the address in case you have not seen it yet:<<
Aroid-l mailing list