IAS on Facebook
IAS on Instagram
IAS Aroid Quasi Forum
This is a continuously updated archive of the Aroid-L mailing list in a forum format - not an actual Forum. If you want to post, you will still need to register for the Aroid-L mailing list and send your postings by e-mail for moderation in the normal way.
"Aroideana" vs. Newsletter vs. Aroidl
From: Betsy Feuerstein ecuador at midsouth.rr.com> on 2001.05.18 at 07:40:52(6514)|
This is a message David Leedy has tried to post on Aroid l and has not
succeeded. I could not get it to go as an attachment so here goes retyped.
Just remember, it is from David.
"Aroidaena" vs. Newsletter vs. Aroidl
A little history may be in order. "Aroideana" was a quarterly publication,
which was usually late. Sometimes it was several years late. So it was
determined to consolidate it into an annual publication.
The newsletter was a means to communicate with members of the IAS in
the United States. It was primarily devoted to the comings and goings in
Miami, but it did contain some good "how to's." As with any volunteer organization,
the newsletter fell on hard times because no one had the time to put it
together. In the 1980's, before Aroidl, I thought it was important for
members who did not llive within driving distance of miami (for the monthly
meetings) to have a regular form of communication. So I took over the editorshp.
The newsletter I put out had little original material, but included
a lot of "how to's." I plagiarized and copied everything I could get hold
of including the Newsletter written by David Burnett for the Australian
Aroid Society. I remember a great article he wrote (or copied) regarding
the various types of fungus, which could cause rot in aroid tuers and how
to fight these. I generally included an article or two(copied or plagiarized),
correspondence, a list of recent aroid publications and how to obtain them,
horticultural events at teh variouis botanical gardens in the United States,
which might be of interest to IAS members, and reviews of aroid publications
or events, which were not to be covered in "Aroideana" (e.g. the anthurium
hybridization programs at the University of Hawaii or the A. titanium meristem
experiments at the Palmgarten in Frankfurt).
An important factor in the 1980's ws member's dues. This, along with
the plant sale at teh annual meeting, was the primary financing used for
the publication of "Aroideana." The newsletter was a means of soliciting
new members ("Give an IAS Membership for Your Mom for Mother's Day") as
well as keeping old members, who felt that receipt of "Aroideana," sometimes
two years late, was not really worth the amount of the dues. Maybe this
is no longer true.
I have forgotten what happened next, but when Su Thompson took over
editorship of the newsletter it really stepped up in class. She included
much more material regarding recent publications and current events of
interest to aroid folx. Neal Caroll's newsletter was also great. However,
if there is to be a newsletter, I think punctuality is at least as important
as content (this is not necessarily teh credo of "Aroideana")
Perhaps Aroidl has taken over the need for communications with IAS members,
but I an not so sure. Not everyone is comfortable with a computer or wants
to spend a lot of time looking at the CRT. "Aroideana" has now become an
annual journal. for those who don't participate in Aroidl or live within
the Miami area, the newsletter was teh only regular contact with fellow
aroid enthusiasts in the United States. aroidl is generally a question/comment
and then a response type of thing versus a page or tow on how to do something
relative to aroids. The newsletter was a place to get ideas and compare
notes, but it need not be original material, which couldh have a place
in " Aroideana." Also, articles in the newsletter can and very basic (like
plastic containers versus clay containers or use of screen wire to cover
teh holes in pots), which may be beneath "Aroideana."
I understand Messrs. Boyce or Hetterscheid pleas for original material
for "Aroideana," but there is a lot of other material, some not so original;
material which has a time element that will not be met by an annual publication,
even if it is timely published; and origianl material, which will not be
published in "Aroideana." Should this material be presented in a regularly
published newsletter? I don't know. I don't believe either of these gentlemen
is qualified to make such a judgement for teh layman collector and the
IAS officers will hae to make the judgement as to the benefit to the organization.
PS: typing errors are my responsibility/Betsy
Note: this is a very old post, so no reply function is available.